Why the Covid-19 Vaccines Had to be Forced on the Entire Planet
As Explained by Yale Prof. Emeritus of Epidemiology, Dr. Harvey Risch
The information below was presented by Dr. Harvey Risch* on February 26, 2024, while speaking at the U.S. Senate on: “Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding? Roundtable Discussion.”
Dr. Rich’s full, unedited presentation:
“I'm talking today about the crushingly obsessive push to Covid-vaccinate every living person on the planet.
We all know circumstantially that the virus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in fall 2019. The initial cases paralleled the Wuhan subway line 2, which passes by the WIV. The virus contains a unique 19 nucleotide genetic sequence that also exists in Moderna patents from 2017. And various other biological and intelligence evidence that overwhelmingly implicates the WIV as the source of the leak.
The Covid-19 pandemic virus exists because it was bioengineered. WIV scientists used Ralph Baric's genetic manipulation techniques at their insecure BSL-2 lab. This reckless WIV work was funded by NIH through the Daszak EcoHealth Alliance Money Laundry, as well as by large DoD and USAID grants.
This work and the WIV leak was the fruit of our Bioweapons Industry that has been performing secretive and nefarious biological weapons development for the last 70 years. The recognition of the possible accidental or intentional unleashing of an infectious agent capable of killing large fractions of humanity led to the bioweapons treaty of 1975, that President Ford signed. The treaty prohibits the development of offensive bioweapons. However, the one loophole of the treaty is that small quantities of offensive bioweapons are allowed to be developed, in order to do research on vaccine countermeasures.
This loophole was then exploited by our bioweapons industry for the last 50 years. The bioweapons treaty in theory limited offensive bioweapons development to agents that would address vaccine development, so-called dual use agents or dual-use research. This was the premise and motivation of the various virology grant applications like DEFUSE submitted to DoD and NIH funders. The permitted rationale for development of offensive bioweapons agents is that the work leads to vaccine countermeasures.
Now fast forward to 2019. Many billions of dollars [were] spent on the bioweapons industry over the past decades for all of this work on offensive bioweapons. Where are the successful commercial vaccines to show for it? Lots of vaccine research has been carried out for known harmful organisms, but minimally if at all for gain-of-function bioweapons agents. It took a year of shoddy research to produce and test the first batch of commercial vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. How is a year delay even remotely acceptable for military defense against a bioweapon that spreads across populations in weeks? And vaccines are supposed to be deployed before a pandemic occurs, not in the middle of one.
My hypothesis is that both the virus origin cover-up and the forced vaccination of the entire planet were orchestrated to protect the integrity of the bioweapons industry. Once the general public understood the reckless and cavalier behavior of the industry, and that it operated under a false and misrepresented pretense of vaccine development that has never been successfully commercially realized, it would clamor to shut down the industry. The suppression of knowledge of the industry's reckless involvement in the Wuhan leak is an obvious cover-up. We have proof of the cover-up from the FOIA documents involving Fauci, Collins, Jeremy Farrar and others.
My conclusion is that the reason why the whole population had to be vaccinated is to show that the bioweapons industry supposedly did have a rationale of vaccine development as part of its claimed "dual-use" research. The vaccines are the evidence that the bioweapons industry was properly justified from the beginning. Without a successful vaccine to show for itself in a time of pandemic crisis, especially one caused by a leak from a bioweapons industry source itself, it would be clear to everyone that the rationale for the industry's existence was a fraud from the outset. Thus, the Covid vaccines supplied the defense against the charge that the bioweapons industry was not actually dual-use but offensive only, violating the 1975 treaty. So the vaccines had to be dramatically pushed out, to be the "universal solution," to show that the bioweapons industry was actually working for the public good. In this context, it did not matter what collateral damage the vaccines caused. What mattered was that the public thought that the industry had been doing its work to produce usable vaccines, not offensive bioweapons.
-/-/-/-/-/-/-
*Dr. Harvey Risch is Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health; MD, PhD. Fellow, American College of Epidemiology. Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Scientist in Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases); Affiliated Faculty, Yale Institute for Global Health.
Dr. Risch is also Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and for six years was a Member of the Board of Editors, the American Journal of Epidemiology. Dr. Risch is an author of more than 400 original peer-reviewed research publications in the medical literature and those research papers have been cited by other scientific publications more than 52,000 times.
Risch assumes that there was indeed a pandemic, but if people like Jessica Hockett, Denis Rancourt, Martin Neil, Charles Wright, and several others, are right, then the explanation for a lot of hospital/nursing home deaths is iatrogenesis, rather than that they were swept away in a pandemic. If you delete Risch’s assumption the case can still be made that the bioweapons industry needed to justify itself by rolling out the vaccines as a “universal solution”.
I’ve been following the claims made by biologist J. J. Couey, who says that, as a single-stranded RNA quasispecies, SARS-CoV-2 is not sufficiently replication competent to cause a pandemic. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_quasispecies to get some understanding of what this means.) I don’t know enough to know whether Couey is right, but it makes an important difference. If the public believes Risch’s assumption then it can be stampeded again into leaping off the cliff, but if the public came to believe that coronaviruses cannot cause pandemics then the stampede would be difficult to initiate. I think it is well worth keeping this possibility in mind.
Wow! It never entered my mind there could have been such devious reasoning behind this demonstration.