Risch assumes that there was indeed a pandemic, but if people like Jessica Hockett, Denis Rancourt, Martin Neil, Charles Wright, and several others, are right, then the explanation for a lot of hospital/nursing home deaths is iatrogenesis, rather than that they were swept away in a pandemic. If you delete Risch’s assumption the case can still be made that the bioweapons industry needed to justify itself by rolling out the vaccines as a “universal solution”.
I’ve been following the claims made by biologist J. J. Couey, who says that, as a single-stranded RNA quasispecies, SARS-CoV-2 is not sufficiently replication competent to cause a pandemic. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_quasispecies to get some understanding of what this means.) I don’t know enough to know whether Couey is right, but it makes an important difference. If the public believes Risch’s assumption then it can be stampeded again into leaping off the cliff, but if the public came to believe that coronaviruses cannot cause pandemics then the stampede would be difficult to initiate. I think it is well worth keeping this possibility in mind.
I could not possibly disagree more. He is saying to justify “dual-use” research? Justify it to who? The world at large that has zero ability change any of this corruption anyway? There is no point in trying to convince the world this bio weapons industry was doing what it should because the people can’t do anything about it anyway. Three reasons for this jab. Depopulation, destroy the world economy so a one world government would have to be instituted to correct it and redistribution of wealth making the rich richer and the middle class poor.
I think he missed the part where big pharma and Fauci wanted the new mRNA technology in use and they didn't want to wait the usual 10 or more years it would usually take to make sure the new product was safe.whst better way to get it introduced quickly than a release of a virus from Wuhan? And the market is now open to all their lineup of expected mRNA treatments to come. Everybody wins except for the population of course
Well we now see clearly how the parasites profited at the cost of humanity not to mention how they have infiltrated most parliaments world wide in a subversive way to get politicians to do their bidding. Nature will deal with each and every one eventually.
Risch assumes that there was indeed a pandemic, but if people like Jessica Hockett, Denis Rancourt, Martin Neil, Charles Wright, and several others, are right, then the explanation for a lot of hospital/nursing home deaths is iatrogenesis, rather than that they were swept away in a pandemic. If you delete Risch’s assumption the case can still be made that the bioweapons industry needed to justify itself by rolling out the vaccines as a “universal solution”.
I’ve been following the claims made by biologist J. J. Couey, who says that, as a single-stranded RNA quasispecies, SARS-CoV-2 is not sufficiently replication competent to cause a pandemic. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_quasispecies to get some understanding of what this means.) I don’t know enough to know whether Couey is right, but it makes an important difference. If the public believes Risch’s assumption then it can be stampeded again into leaping off the cliff, but if the public came to believe that coronaviruses cannot cause pandemics then the stampede would be difficult to initiate. I think it is well worth keeping this possibility in mind.
Wow! It never entered my mind there could have been such devious reasoning behind this demonstration.
This seems like a naive explanation given Event 201, GAVI, etc. First, follow the money.
Any idea how this information was received by the attending politicians? How may were present? Was there a split in views on party lines?
Elizabeth, a little known fact is that Harvey worked with Zev Zelenko for awhile..
And I personally emailed Harvey, to notify him that Zev's protocol was BASED upon Ralph Baric's 2010 research.. I still have the email.
Yet, I've NEVER heard Harvey invoke Baric's name in the EARLY treatment debate.
I could not possibly disagree more. He is saying to justify “dual-use” research? Justify it to who? The world at large that has zero ability change any of this corruption anyway? There is no point in trying to convince the world this bio weapons industry was doing what it should because the people can’t do anything about it anyway. Three reasons for this jab. Depopulation, destroy the world economy so a one world government would have to be instituted to correct it and redistribution of wealth making the rich richer and the middle class poor.
I think he missed the part where big pharma and Fauci wanted the new mRNA technology in use and they didn't want to wait the usual 10 or more years it would usually take to make sure the new product was safe.whst better way to get it introduced quickly than a release of a virus from Wuhan? And the market is now open to all their lineup of expected mRNA treatments to come. Everybody wins except for the population of course
Well we now see clearly how the parasites profited at the cost of humanity not to mention how they have infiltrated most parliaments world wide in a subversive way to get politicians to do their bidding. Nature will deal with each and every one eventually.
I very much agree with Dr. Harvey Risch assessment.
What the pandemic revealed was also the total lack of understanding among "experts" and doctors about mucosal immunity. https://twitter.com/GauteNilsen/status/1698232618402132263
Excellent piece!